|
Receivers » Neosat ipro 2000 Reviews
|
AVERAGE RATING 
Currently the channels are looking good when using IKS functionality. When a big ECM hits Neosat ipro 2000 is still on its feet while the rest non IKS FTA STBs are in the dark. Ofcourse when maintenance is done in the IKS servers, the IKS functionality disconnects and only resort is the BASIC autoroll Function. Ofcourse minor freeses occur but will recommend |
NeoSat Ipro 2000 
Reviewed by NeoSat on 27-2-2008 (Earth) |
| The Neosat ipro 2000 has some great capabilities. It has PVR functionality and can update via ETHERNET connection/usb/com1 connection. Currently the channels are looking good when using IKS functionality. When a big ECM hits Neosat ipro 2000 is still on its feet while the rest non IKS FTA STBs are in the dark. Ofcourse when maintenance is done in the IKS servers, the IKS functionality disconnects and only resort is the BASIC autoroll Function. Ofcourse minor freeses occur but will recommend |
|
Was this helpful? YES - NO
42% of users found this review helpful. |
The quick short of it. 
Reviewed by FTAnonymous on 13-5-2008 (Canada) |
| I wish it was like the TESSAT but with PVR capabilities. I was sadly disappointed. The good: + IKS capabilities. The bad: - The picture quality is poorer than other IKS receivers, i.e. the fore mentioned TESSAT. - The IKS setup is a nuisance. - It's remote control response time is delayed and frustrating. I'm not impressed with this, although others may find it just great. I'm currently sticking with my non-pvr tessat, and my non-iks CNX duo personally. This ipro 2000 is collecting dust due to these minor inconveniences combined simply grinding my gears after continued usage. |
|
Was this helpful? YES - NO
57% of users found this review helpful. |
|
Return to Receivers Reviews |
